The US-EU Relationship is Key to Both Sides and World Peace

Source: Euractiv

The US-EU relationship has been damaged during the Donald Trump administration. The Transatlantic alliance can only be rebuilt if it is redefined. Trust has been broken on several US commitments and Europe will no longer accept being treated as obsolete.

The Geopolitical Scene

Whether intentional or not, the geopolitical scene is different since Trump, yet increasingly confrontational.

Russia and China present a united front to the West — but there’s plenty of potential for friction. Russia’s foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, and his Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, met last March and signed a declaration, which pledged to reject the politicization of human rights and interference in their countries’ internal affairs — clearly aimed at the West.

On the other side of this unholy alliance, both the United States and the European Union need to face a new reality: they cannot succeed without a strong partnership. Indeed, like the EU-US agenda for Global Change (December 2020) states: “Our joint commitment is essential in a world where authoritarian powers seek to subvert democracies, aggressive actors try to destabilize regions and institutions, and closed economies exploit the openness our own societies depend on.”

At the core of this ambition are strong values. In the words of Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission: “the transatlantic alliance is based on shared values and history, but also interests: building a stronger, more peaceful and more prosperous world.”

Recognizing our Differences

Even though there is a new and positive political momentum, embedded in shared values, redefining the US-EU alliance might be different for each party.

At the center of this difference in vision lies the question of the United States’ constitutional resilience. The Trump Presidency has evidenced the power of the White House to withdraw from treaties and commitments related to open skies surveillance, nuclear arms control (including Iran), global warming, UN human rights, NAFTA, among many others. In the middle of a global pandemic, dropping the US commitment to the World Health Organization was a tricky bet. This raises significant doubts about the trustworthiness of the signature of a US President.

If Europe is forced to question the US’ commitments every four years, diplomacy and leadership alone will never be enough.

The NATO alliance is critical but it also needs to be redefined. The NATO 2030 Plan will aim toreinforc[e] Allied unity, solidarity, and cohesion, including to cement the centrality of the transatlantic bond.”

Are the US and EU truly committed to multilateral cooperation? It requires leadership on both sides of the Atlantic.

The Promising Avenues of Cooperation

By concentrating on areas of cooperation, the US and the EU can reinforce their relationship and rebuild trust. Doing so must also include recognition of cultural differences between the parties.

1. China is a thorny problem because it is multifaceted. There is no good compromise possible on China’s disregard for human rights. The risk of military intervention, whether in Taiwan or the China Sea, is a common undertaking. Contrary to the EU, the US has for too long upheld the illusion that it can, and is entitled to, change regimes abroad: many wars were predicated on this idea. The economic relationship can be in the mutual interest, provided that security is not compromised.

2. Climate Change was denied by the Trump administration and the Republican Party. Europe is a global leader in addressing climate change. If the US wants to join that effort, it needs to accept scientific evidence. The US must secure its alliance by proving that climate commitments are not easily reversible and by installing private and public investments to improve the climate situation. Today, there appears to be hope, with the US and EU having largely convergent climate plans.

3. Immigration is a shared experience between the United States and Europe. Migrations across countries are as old as mankind, and migrants are not the enemy as long as we learn from our mistakes. Europe and the US appeal to geographically different populations. With an aging and declining population, the West will need migrants.

Source: UNHCR

It is critical to create a permanent infrastructure and integration with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees that will prioritize those who flee prosecution and war from those who are seeking better pastures. Europe and the US have an opportunity to drive this world effort.

The convergence of values and interests between the US and Europe is unquestionable. The last four years have destabilized and weakened this vital relationship on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. A respectful and level playing field is the only way to restore trust and confidence. World peace is at stake.




CEO at Galileo Global Advisors and Adjunct professor Columbia Law School.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Alberta Issued Invitations To Express Entry Candidates

Alberta Issued Invitations To Express Entry Candidates

Davao’s Majestic City Hall: Home to the Philippines’ Running Vice President Sara Duterte

Davao City Hall in the Philippines

Little Blue Men: China’s Armed Fishing Militia

Who and what is ‘civil society’?

Young Women Behind the Walls

Lockdown, A Costly Action

Which is the smallest river of Pakistan?

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Georges Ugeux

Georges Ugeux

CEO at Galileo Global Advisors and Adjunct professor Columbia Law School.

More from Medium

A Lesson from the The Garden of Eden by Steve

Why this is the worst time for Britain to halve its foreign aid

The Right Thing is the Often Hardest Thing to Do

“The Darkest Hours”